Keith A. Pray - Professional and Academic Site
About Me
·
·
·
LinkedIn Profile Facebook Profile GoodReads Profile
Professional
Academic
Teaching
                                          
Printer Friendly Version
Report

Intro ] [ codedescription ] [ summary ]

Experiments ] [ Up: Sets of Rules ]

Summary of Results

      All the tests run produced the same accuracy and the exact same set of rules. From the long traces it can be seen that the same steps were taken to arrive at these rules. The rules produced can be seen in the results for the first test.

To recap, three approaches were tried.

  1. all non-continuous attributes were left as possibly ordered types
    • This lets Foil decide which attributes are ordered and which are not
  2. The Education attribute was specified as an ordered type
  3. Education specified as ordered type and
    Race and Sex were specified as unordered type

The accuracy over all test data was 81.3341%.

The best results over the learning methods so far

Method Accuracy over all testing data (%)
Decision Tree 86.0881
Naive Bayes 84.2700
Foil (Learning sets of Rules) 81.3341
Neural Network 77.1329
Genetic Algorithm 76.8932

Foil produced the third best accuracy, and arguably, the easiest to comprehend classifier to date.

Things to try to improve accuracy include

  • Trying more combinations or ordered and unordered attributes.
  • Specifying theory constants
  • Everything else that worked for other people in the class


by: Keith A. Pray
Last Modified: July 4, 2004 9:02 AM
© 2004 - 1975 Keith A. Pray.
All rights reserved.

Current Theme: 

Kapowee Hosted | Kapow Generated in 0.008 second | XHTML | CSS